Wednesday, February 24, 2016
We almost got reviewers' comments published
Our goal from the beginning has been to immediately publish all the
scientific content related to the project. One relevant part of the
content are discussions between reviewers and authors during the peer
review process. We have now published two peer reviewed articles: NMRlipids I and NMRlipids V.
In both cases we have asked from the editor if we can publish also the
reviewer's comments since everything else is public. As expected, in the
NMRlipids I case the Journal of Physical Chemistry staff replied that this is not possible. However, editorial and publishing teams of BBA Membranes' were positive about publishing the referee's comments in the case of NMRlipids V
publication. Both referees were also sympathetic to the idea. However,
one of them declined stating permission to make comments available
should be asked a priori, at the same time referees are invited to
review a paper. This is an important learning point from this
experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Come to think of it, why would you need permissions? The comments are anonymous, non-copyrighted. Publishing comments might be a good way to improve quality of refereeing...
ReplyDeleteWhen people write referee comments, they usually assume that those will not be publicly available. Despite of the legal details, I think that it is fair to ask the permission in this case. In the case of NMRlipids II manuscript, I attached a letter for referee's in the submission where the permission is asked: https://github.com/NMRLipids/lipid_ionINTERACTION/blob/master/Manuscript/LetterToReferees.pdf
DeleteAs mentioned above, I asked a permission to publish referees' comments related to NMRlipids II from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics journal staff and reviewers. The permission was not granted because this is the policy of the journal.
ReplyDelete